A claim wall for biomechanics
A mechanics engine for lifters is only trustworthy if the outputs it cannot support are unreachable by construction, not merely omitted from the current release.
Paper reactions, research notes, hardware lessons, and commentary on what seems important or overhyped in the current research landscape.
A mechanics engine for lifters is only trustworthy if the outputs it cannot support are unreachable by construction, not merely omitted from the current release.
A workshop number only counts once something the author did not derive agrees with it; when it does not, the notebook says so instead of hiding it.
Gradus grades and diagnoses with rules, not a model, so every outcome is reproducible; the price is a heavy authoring contract and an audit for hollow content.
Locked memos, validity gates, and paired-seed statistics turned a memory-architecture idea into a program where a negative result is as usable as a positive one.
The capture loop closed with hand-dialed recipes plus a longitudinal log; the Sony live push arrived last, set four of six fields, and was an optimization.

The strongest result was not a single winning denoiser: preserving the activity carrier and using spatial separation features for ranking proved more reliable.
EEG work gets more informative when temporal structure is part of the model instead of something the pipeline averages away.
Biosignal research gets cleaner when hardware, firmware, and modeling are treated as one system instead of three separate concerns.
Workshop design works better when theory and application are taught as one loop instead of two separate tracks.